Wi-Fi Equipped Nanobots Could Revolutionize Medicine


Nano-inspirations often hit first thing in the morning. A concept for nanobot application occurred to me when I awoke this morning that could revolutionize neurology. If nanobots can be built to receive radio signals, then they can also be engineered to detect weak electrical fields such as those that traverse our nervous systems. The proximity of nanobots in the bloodstream to the nerve cells would permit sensitivity to such weak fields, and if the nanobots could transmit weak, narrow-band radio signals to provide measurements of nerve activity, it is possible that much new information could be learned about the nervous system. Of course, the subject would need to be in an electrically quiet environment such as a Faraday cage (no cellphones allowed), and all equipment inside the cage would need to be carefully shielded and bypassed to further eliminate unwanted electrical fields, but the concept seems feasible. Since nano-scale radio receivers have already been demonstrated (link), it doesn’t seem far fetched to have them transmit as well, and, with enough sophistication and computing power, achieve the capability for Wi-Fi-like networking (link).  So how could this capability be applied?

A simple nanobot application involves nerve signal intensity measurement. A simple neurological application of nanobots would involve the nanobots emitting narrow band radio signals proportional to the electrical field they detect. The subject under evaluation would wear a suit containing elements that would emit light depending on the strength of the nanobot signals received, and high speed video cameras could record the intensity and duration of nerve signals by the intensity of light emitted by the suit. Any disconnects or aberrations in the nervous system would be immediately visible. A variety of improvements in sophistication could be achieved by applying concepts such as measuring the waveforms expressed in the light intensities of different emitters over time.

Self-identifying nanobots could be possible, with increasingly sophisticated applications. With increased sophistication (which could required larger nanobots, or “microbots”, to encompass the increased complexity) each nanobot could send a string of bits to identify itself followed by another string of bits (number) to indicate the intensity of the electrical field it was detecting. Larger and more sophisticated microbots (still microscopic but orders of magnitude larger than nanobots) could have the computing power to collect the digital signals from the nanobots near them, provide additional digital processing power, and help trace back the measurements to their physical origins. Such microbots could also be capable of identifying each other and networking. To avoid the potential mish-mash of thousands of simultaneous tiny narrowband signals and increase the ability to detect and record individual signals, data collection could be accomplished by having the subject wear a suit woven with a matrix of sensors that would acquire the microbots’ signals, and possibly communicate with them in Wi-Fi fashion to collect the data in an organized and traceable way or modify the processing they would perform.

Active stimulation of the nervous system could enable further research and treatments. To enable further study, microbots might eventually be used to actively stimulate nerve cells such that the interactions and pathways in the nervous system could be studied in more detail. Just as microprocessors are currently in use to help unscramble the nervous signals of patients suffering from a variety of neurological disorders, even more sophisticated forms of human-machine interface could be made possible through the use of radio and Wi-Fi-capable nanobots. I am sure I am only scratching the surface of the possibilities.

As always, I welcome your comments. – Tim

Advertisements

4 responses to “Wi-Fi Equipped Nanobots Could Revolutionize Medicine

  1. Great post. I’m just waiting what more shall I see in future science inventions!

    Aminul Islam,
    Technology writer of various websites and print medias of Bangladesh,
    Dhaka, Bangladesh.

  2. that sounds great but what about price? you would have to get a special room and all this special equipment just to do the surgery not even mentioning the nanobots themselves? if this was achievable the economical cost and downfall would be greater than the profit. and who could afford such surgery with the recession were in?

  3. I don’t expect to see such technologies for at least 20 years, perhaps much longer, and I expect the economic picture to change a lot by then. My intent was to imagine technological development that might be possible, given what we know today, but which would be far advanced. Certainly the technology to manufacture such devices doesn’t exist today, but there are signs that indicate the possibility. Cost is always a concern in the development and application of new technology, but the possibility of designing nanodevices that can assemble themselves from a particular mix of molecules (quite possibly the way life first started on earth) suggests cost might not be as big a factor as one might think. Certainly there is no way to assemble such huge quantities of such tiny things one-by-one. The future awaits to excite those who dare to dream.

  4. An additional thought: if nanobots, through size limitations and the need for simplicity, can’t contain enough processing power to decode radio signals, they might still be controlled via chemical means. If a smaller number of larger, radio-capable nanobots could be used to receive radio signals and emit specific chemicals, those chemicals might control or direct the efforts of the rest of the nanobots and save them the data processing work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s